Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5V leads 37.4 to 14.2.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1347 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1354 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1353 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
Multimodal GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | 1154 |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | — |
| LMArena German | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1311 |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1304 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1332 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and GLM-4.5V share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.