Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 38.0 to 14.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 50% for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and 62.8% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2025-06-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1373 |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 325.9 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 36.9% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1377 |
| DTBench | 50% | 62.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.5% |
| LMCA | — | 18.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.94 |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1373 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 48% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1373 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.9% |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | 1198 |
| VPCT | — | 30% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1369 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1404 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | 1388 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 1359 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1396 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1367 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 47.2% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1379 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1367 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1366 |
| WildBench | — | 81.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33.