Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

43.0

Rank #102 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 38.8 to 9.3.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.343.0
Released2023-12-132025-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked2425

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding11081440
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11091428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
DTBench45.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math11321440
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
Omni-MATH—46.7%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert10591417
GPQA Diamond34%—
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English11381407
LMArena Chinese11241460
LMArena French11451413
LMArena German11251417
LMArena Japanese10231395
LMArena Russian11861404
LMArena Spanish11191435
LMArena Korean—1364

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11141389
IFEval—81%

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11321403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text11491417
LMArena Creative Writing11311334
LMArena Multi-Turn11391416
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper