Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen Turbo
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 27.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Turbo in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Turbo leads 22.2 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 56.2% for Qwen Turbo.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Qwen Turbo leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 56.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
Knowledge Qwen Turbo leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen Turbo?
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 27.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen Turbo share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.