Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Phi-4 Mini
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 Mini leads 25.3 to 15.6.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Phi-4 Mini leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Phi-4 Mini?
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.