Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Phi-1.5
Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#327); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
- Phi-1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | — |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2023-09-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 90.82 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 70% | 37.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Phi-1.5?
Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#327); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Phi-1.5 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.