Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Mistral Small 3.2
Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 26.3 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 131.74 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
Math Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.