Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 27.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.2 90B leads 21.7 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 27.5 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 125.5 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
Math Llama 3.2 90B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 39.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.2 90B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 41% |
| MMLU | 70% | 80.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 27.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.