Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1270 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1264 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1274 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1245 |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.