Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.1 leads 38.9 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1435 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1438 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1400 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1437 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.7 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4.1 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.