Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | — | 28.6 |
| Released | 2024-01-04 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 1 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 79.7% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision has 1 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.