Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision vs Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#52); Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Summary

  • Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision and Kimi K2.6 specifications
Gemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index—47.5
Released2024-01-042026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked151

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1509
SciCode—53.5%
WeirdML—55.9%
LMArena Coding—1488
ALE-Bench—1,093

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
ExploitBench—18.4%
GBAEval—0.9%
GDP.pdf—12%
Vending-Bench 2—6,205

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
NYT Connections (extended)—87.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EBR-Bench—2.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1470
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—37.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.03

Math Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34)

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
GPQA Diamond—90.8%
SimpleQA Verified—34.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.8%
LMArena Expert—1491

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Vision—1282
Blueprint-Bench 2—3.9%
Furniture Assembly—21.7%
LMArena Document—1451
ScienceQA79.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Non-English—1446
LMArena Chinese—1521
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1449
LMArena Japanese—1442
LMArena Korean—1428
LMArena Russian—1446
LMArena Spanish—1463

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Instruction Following—1451

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Longer Query—1468

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Text—1455
LMArena Creative Writing—1434
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1725
EQ-Bench 4—1202
LMArena Multi-Turn—1453

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#52); Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision and Kimi K2.6 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision has 1 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper