Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision vs GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 OpenAI

59.5

Rank #14 Confirmed

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision and GPT-5.4 specifications
Gemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index—59.5
Released2024-01-042026-03-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked168

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 52.8 (#28)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
SWE-bench Verified—76.9%
DeepSWE—51.8%
LMArena WebDev—1465
SciCode—56.6%
GSO—31.4%
WeirdML—77.7%
LMArena Coding—1497
MirrorCode—15.6%
ALE-Bench—1,607
AlgoTune—1.85

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 46.5 (#12)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
Terminal-Bench—81.8%
APEX-Agents—52.4%
τ²-bench Banking—39.4%
DeepResearch Bench—35.1%
PostTrainBench—19%
GBAEval—45.1%
LMArena Search—1197
METR Time Horizons—74.3%
Vending-Bench 2—6,144

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 61.7 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
ARC-AGI-2—74%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—91.3%
ARC-AGI-1—93.7%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—44%
EnigmaEval—16%
Thematic Generalization—80%
EBR-Bench—25.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1485
Mystery Game Puzzles—37%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—52%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.92
ForecastBench—59.5

Math Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 73.3 (#14)

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 65.3 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
GPQA Diamond—93.3%
Humanity's Last Exam—36.2%
SimpleQA Verified—45.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 43.8 (#19)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
LMArena Vision—1302
Blueprint-Bench 2—27.1%
Furniture Assembly—37.5%
LMArena Document—1471
ScienceQA79.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 56.4 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
LMArena Non-English—1465
LMArena Chinese—1520
LMArena French—1493
LMArena German—1472
LMArena Japanese—1484
LMArena Korean—1449
LMArena Russian—1480
LMArena Spanish—1453

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 77.3 (#25)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
LMArena Instruction Following—1469

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 50.3 (#8)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
CL-bench—27.9%
CL-bench Life—21.7%
LMArena Longer Query—1474

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision: —, GPT-5.4: 72.1 (#18)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Pro VisionGPT-5.4
LMArena Text—1469
LMArena Creative Writing—1439
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
EQ-Bench 4—1272
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision better than GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4 has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision and GPT-5.4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision has 1 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 has 68.

Related comparisons

Go deeper