Model comparison
Falcon-7B vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B has enough public results to be ranked (#234); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Falcon-7B | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 34.2 |
| Released | 2023-04-24 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1168 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 28.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 95.1 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
| HellaSwag | 78.1% | — |
| LAMBADA | 74.9% | — |
| PIQA | 80.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 67.2% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
| GSM8K | 6.8% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 47.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.3% | — |
| MMLU | 35% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 51.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 64.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon-7B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Falcon-7B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-7B better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B has enough public results to be ranked (#234); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-7B and Qwen1.5-110B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-7B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.