Model comparison

Falcon-7B vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Falcon-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-7B and Grok 4.6 specifications
Falcon-7BGrok 4.6
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstitutexAI
Noometry Index—56.9
Released2023-04-242026-08-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1249

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
LMArena Coding—1465
ALE-Bench—1,508

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
Epoch Capabilities Index95.1156.44
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1447
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—48.5%
BIG-Bench Hard28.8%—
HellaSwag78.1%—
LAMBADA74.9%—
PIQA80.3%—
WinoGrande67.2%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—51%
LMArena Math—1423
GSM8K6.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%
LMArena Expert—1467
ARC (AI2) Challenge47.9%—
BoolQ75.3%—
MMLU35%—
OpenBookQA51.6%—
TriviaQA64.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Vision—1263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Non-English—1420
LMArena Chinese—1480
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1376
LMArena Korean—1397
LMArena Russian—1422
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following—1431

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query—1454

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Text—1428
LMArena Creative Writing—1428
LMArena Multi-Turn—1425

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-7B better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-7B and Grok 4.6 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-7B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper