Model comparison

Falcon-7B vs GPT-4o mini

GPT-4o mini has enough public results to be ranked (#337); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Falcon-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-7B and GPT-4o mini specifications
Falcon-7BGPT-4o mini
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index—25.4
Released2023-04-242024-07-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked1260

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 21.6 (#330)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
Aider Polyglot—3.6%
WeirdML—11.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46.1%
LiveBench Coding—43.1%
LMArena Coding—1290
BigCodeBench Complete—57.4%
HumanEval+—83.5%
MBPP+—72.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 27.2 (#95)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
BALROG—17.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 8.7 (#343)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
Epoch Capabilities Index94.49126.56
PIQA80.3%88.7%
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—10.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—28.8%
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—32.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1267
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—54.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis—50%
LMCA—10.4%
BIG-Bench Hard28.8%—
HellaSwag78.1%—
LAMBADA74.9%—
LiveBench—41.3%
WinoGrande67.2%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 9.9 (#307)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
GSM8K6.8%91.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—0.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.9%
Omni-MATH—28%
LiveBench Math—36.3%
LMArena Math—1267
MATH Level 5—52.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 17.7 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
BoolQ75.3%88.7%
MMLU35%81.8%
GPQA Diamond—37.7%
SimpleQA Verified—8.3%
MMLU-Pro—60.3%
Confabulations—37.2%
GPQA (HELM)—36.8%
LMArena Expert—1235
ARC (AI2) Challenge47.9%—
OpenBookQA51.6%—
TriviaQA64.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 25.3 (#117)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
LMArena Vision—1066
Video-MME—64.8%
GeoBench—64%
VPCT—34%

Multilingual Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 42.2 (#194)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
LMArena Non-English—1266
LMArena Chinese—1264
LMArena French—1296
LMArena German—1272
LMArena Japanese—1216
LMArena Korean—1195
LMArena Russian—1275
LMArena Spanish—1276

Instruction Following Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 62.1 (#234)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
LiveBench Instruction Following—56.8%
IFEval—78.2%
LMArena Instruction Following—1259

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 39.1 (#181)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
LMArena Longer Query—1289

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Falcon-7B: —, GPT-4o mini: 39.7 (#243)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-7BGPT-4o mini
LMArena Text—1286
LMArena Creative Writing—1268
Short-Story Creative Writing—67.2%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—873
WildBench—79.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1285
LiveBench Language—28.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-7B better than GPT-4o mini?

GPT-4o mini has enough public results to be ranked (#337); Falcon-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-7B and GPT-4o mini share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-7B has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4o mini has 60.

Related comparisons

Go deeper