Model comparison
Falcon 2 11B vs Llama 3.2 1B
Llama 3.2 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#349); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Meta |
| Noometry Index | — | 19.9 |
| Released | 2024-05-09 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 60K |
| Max output | — | 54K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.027 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 5 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 20.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 8.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1071 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 11.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 14.5 (#142)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 15.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 109.25 | 101.95 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1044 |
| HellaSwag | 82.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 78.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 9.7 (#308)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1086 |
| GSM8K | 53.8% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1007 |
| MMLU | 58.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 23.9 (#287)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 958 |
| LMArena German | — | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 941 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 52.6 (#285)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#269)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1050 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Falcon 2 11B: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 21.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | Falcon 2 11B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1033 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1030 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon 2 11B better than Llama 3.2 1B?
Llama 3.2 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#349); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Falcon 2 11B and Llama 3.2 1B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon 2 11B has 5 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.