Noometry

Model comparison

Falcon 2 11B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#29); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Falcon 2 11B Technology Innovation Institute

—

Unranked

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #29 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Falcon 2 11B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteGoogle
Noometry Index—54.1
Released2024-05-092026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$9
Results tracked554

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
SWE-bench Verified—79.3%
DeepSWE—37.4%
LMArena WebDev—1499
SciCode—53.1%
WeirdML—62.6%
LMArena Coding—1492
ALE-Bench—911.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
APEX-Agents—27.5%
GBAEval—6.7%
GDP.pdf—14%
Vending-Bench 2—5,396

Reasoning Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index109.25154.55
ARC-AGI-2—72.1%
SimpleBench—76.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—92.6%
ARC-AGI-1—92.5%
CritPt—13.1%
Chess Puzzles—50%
EnigmaEval—25.4%
EBR-Bench—4.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1488
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—47.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—58.1%
ForecastBench—59
HellaSwag82.9%—
WinoGrande78.3%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—62.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—26.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—76.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—31%
LMArena Math—1502
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%
GSM8K53.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond—92.8%
SimpleQA Verified—66.2%
LMArena Expert—1493
MMLU58.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision—1311
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.6%
LMArena Document—1463

Multilingual Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1475
LMArena Chinese—1525
LMArena French—1490
LMArena German—1500
LMArena Japanese—1481
LMArena Korean—1453
LMArena Russian—1491
LMArena Spanish—1478

Instruction Following Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1466

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1481

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Falcon 2 11B: —, Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46)

BenchmarkFalcon 2 11BGemini 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text—1481
LMArena Creative Writing—1467
EQ-Bench 4—1087
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon 2 11B better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#29); Falcon 2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Falcon 2 11B and Gemini 3.5 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon 2 11B has 5 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper