Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.3 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Falcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.238.1
Released2023-09-062025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1625

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
LMArena Coding—1412
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10071372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13—
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math—1365
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert—1338
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10001346
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena French—1398
LMArena German—1325
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Korean—1305
LMArena Russian—1366
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10471355

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1378

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text10541357
LMArena Creative Writing10891333
LMArena Multi-Turn10131365

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper