Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs o3-mini

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and o3-mini in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where o3-mini leads 75.1 to 53.4.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and o3-mini specifications
Falcon-180Bo3-mini
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index32.236.7
Released2023-09-062024-12-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked1651

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo3-mini
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
LMArena Coding—1378
CadEval—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo3-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10071366
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13140.34
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
ForecastBench—59.6
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
LiveBench—75.9%
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo3-mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—76.9%
LiveBench Math—77.3%
LMArena Math—1396
MATH Level 5—96.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—12.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo3-mini
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%
LMArena Expert—1364
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual o3-mini leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo3-mini
LMArena Non-English10001319
LMArena Chinese—1379
LMArena French—1334
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Russian—1304
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo3-mini
LMArena Instruction Following10471337
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo3-mini
Fiction.LiveBench—50%
LMArena Longer Query—1343

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180Bo3-mini
LMArena Text10541337
LMArena Creative Writing10891286
LMArena Multi-Turn10131320
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than o3-mini?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and o3-mini share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper