Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.6 to 29.3.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Falcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMeta
Noometry Index31.849.9
Released2023-09-062026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1636

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%
LMArena Coding—1497

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts10071486
Epoch Capabilities Index111.89154.32
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
ProofBench—39%
LMArena Math—1477
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
LMArena Expert—1480
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1292
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English10001471
LMArena Chinese—1518
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1445
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1482
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following10471457

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query—1463

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text10541479
LMArena Creative Writing10891440
LMArena Multi-Turn10131484
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper