Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6.1 Sol in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 81.9 to 19.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 65.6 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-09-29 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 75.2% |
| FrontierCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1755 |
| SciCode | — | 55.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1487 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 60% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 32% |
Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1466 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 166.09 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 94.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 95.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98.5% |
| CritPt | — | 31.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 61% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 54.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 80% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 93.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 100% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1464 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 95.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1502 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1288 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 80% |
Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1438 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1477 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1455 |
Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1468 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1465 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1432 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1449 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-6.1 Sol?
GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-6.1 Sol share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 34.