Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

59.2

Rank #17 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.6 Terra in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.6 Terra leads 60.7 to 19.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and GPT-5.6 Terra specifications
Falcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index32.259.2
Released2023-09-062026-07-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$12
Results tracked1652

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 57.7 (#19)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
DeepSWE—69.6%
FrontierCode—41.3%
CursorBench—41.3%
LMArena WebDev—1522
SciCode—55%
WeirdML—78.3%
LMArena Coding—1484
ALE-Bench—1,951

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 40.1 (#25)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
APEX-Agents—58.2%
BALROG—53.2%
GDP.pdf—24.7%
Vending-Bench 2—7,343

Reasoning GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GPT-5.6 Terra: 60.7 (#21)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Hard Prompts10071468
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13159.62
ARC-AGI-2—83.9%
SimpleBench—48.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—51.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—78.4%
ARC-AGI-1—96.5%
CritPt—30%
Chess Puzzles—54%
Mystery Game Puzzles—35%
DTBench—93.3%
LMCA—55%
Surface Evolver Bench—83.8%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 81.6 (#12)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—86%
FrontierMath Tier 4—70.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.7%
ProofBench—74%
LMArena Math—1466
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 61.2 (#30)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
GPQA Diamond—93.3%
SimpleQA Verified—43.2%
LMArena Expert—1492
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 47.3 (#11)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Vision—1271
Blueprint-Bench 2—30.8%
Furniture Assembly—54.2%
LMArena Document—1472

Multilingual GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GPT-5.6 Terra: 54.4 (#44)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Non-English10001439
LMArena Chinese—1513
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1460
LMArena Japanese—1457
LMArena Korean—1425
LMArena Russian—1450
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GPT-5.6 Terra: 76.4 (#40)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Instruction Following10471454

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 44.4 (#68)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference GPT-5.6 Terra leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GPT-5.6 Terra: 70.2 (#23)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text10541447
LMArena Creative Writing10891410
LMArena Multi-Turn10131449
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1855
EQ-Bench 4—1234

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-5.6 Terra share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.6 Terra has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper