Noometry

Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 63.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Falcon-180B Technology Innovation Institute

32.2

Rank #260 Confirmed

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

63.4

Rank #9 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.5 leads 72.8 to 19.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180BGPT-5.5
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index32.263.4
Released2023-09-062026-04-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$5
Output $ / M tokens—$30
Results tracked1671

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.5: 58.2 (#17)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
SWE-bench Verified—80.6%
DeepSWE—67%
FrontierCode—43%
LMArena WebDev—1513
SciCode—56.1%
GSO—40.2%
WeirdML—84.9%
LMArena Coding—1494
MirrorCode—10%
ALE-Bench—1,943

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.5: 50.7 (#6)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
Terminal-Bench—84.7%
APEX-Agents—55.1%
OSWorld 2.0—13%
Remote Labor Index—6.3%
τ²-bench Banking—44.6%
DeepResearch Bench—54%
PostTrainBench—27.2%
ExploitBench—47.4%
GBAEval—53.2%
GDP.pdf—26%
LMArena Search—1242
Vending-Bench 2—7,524

Reasoning GPT-5.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GPT-5.5: 72.8 (#11)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10071489
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13159.1
ARC-AGI-2—85%
SimpleBench—69%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—88.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—96.2%
ARC-AGI-1—95%
CritPt—27.1%
Chess Puzzles—54%
EBR-Bench—34.3%
Mystery Game Puzzles—56%
DTBench—96%
LMCA—54.3%
Surface Evolver Bench—88.1%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
ForecastBench—60.6
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.5: 81.7 (#11)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—85.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—72.5%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—94.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—50%
LMArena Math—1486
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—51.7%
FrontierMath Erdős—0%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—35.4%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.5: 64.4 (#17)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—63%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
LMArena Expert—1508
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.5: 46.9 (#12)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
LMArena Vision—1297
Blueprint-Bench 2—36.2%
Furniture Assembly—44.2%
LMArena Document—1486

Multilingual GPT-5.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GPT-5.5: 56.4 (#20)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
LMArena Non-English10001467
LMArena Chinese—1533
LMArena French—1486
LMArena German—1480
LMArena Japanese—1498
LMArena Korean—1460
LMArena Russian—1473
LMArena Spanish—1468

Instruction Following GPT-5.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GPT-5.5: 77.5 (#18)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
LMArena Instruction Following10471479

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.5: 48.3 (#12)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
CL-bench Life—22.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1484

Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GPT-5.5: 72.7 (#13)

BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-5.5
LMArena Text10541472
LMArena Creative Writing10891455
LMArena Multi-Turn10131476
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1844
EQ-Bench 4—1315

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 63.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-5.5 share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.5 has 71.

Related comparisons

Go deeper