Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs GPT-5.3 Chat
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.3 Chat in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.3 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | GPT-5.3 Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2026-03-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $14 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1408 |
Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1389 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1397 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1383 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1433 |
| LMArena French | — | 1398 |
| LMArena German | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1378 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1396 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1356 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1413 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1690 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-5.3 Chat?
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-5.3 Chat share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.3 Chat has 18.