Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs GPT-3.5-turbo

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GPT-3.5-turbo OpenAI

23.2

Rank #350 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-3.5-turbo in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where GPT-3.5-turbo leads 31.5 to 25.2.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and GPT-3.5-turbo specifications
Falcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteOpenAI
Noometry Index32.223.2
Released2023-09-062023-03-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—16K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$1.50
Results tracked1644

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-3.5-turbo: 23.9 (#331)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
WeirdML—3.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct—39.1%
LMArena Coding—1136
BigCodeBench Complete—50.6%
HumanEval+—70.7%
MBPP+—69.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-3.5-turbo: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
METR Time Horizons—21.5%

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), GPT-3.5-turbo: 13.8 (#332)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts10071108
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13118.55
WinoGrande87.1%81.6%
Chess Puzzles—0%
Mystery Game Puzzles—3%
DTBench—48.5%
LMCA—9.7%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—61.6%
CommonsenseQA 2.0—57%
ForecastBench—50.4
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-3.5-turbo: 6.3 (#327)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
GSM8K54.4%57.8%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—2.2%
LMArena Math—1142
MATH Level 5—15.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-3.5-turbo: 10.0 (#303)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%87.4%
BoolQ89%87%
MMLU70.6%71.4%
OpenBookQA64.2%86%
GPQA Diamond—28%
LMArena Expert—1070
TriviaQA—85.8%

Multilingual GPT-3.5-turbo leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), GPT-3.5-turbo: 31.5 (#258)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
LMArena Non-English10001108
LMArena Chinese—1075
LMArena French—1118
LMArena German—1090
LMArena Japanese—1043
LMArena Korean—1019
LMArena Russian—1123
LMArena Spanish—1121

Instruction Following GPT-3.5-turbo leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), GPT-3.5-turbo: 57.9 (#262)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
LMArena Instruction Following10471119

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, GPT-3.5-turbo: 34.0 (#254)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
LMArena Longer Query—1121

Writing & Preference Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), GPT-3.5-turbo: 25.3 (#305)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGPT-3.5-turbo
LMArena Text10541125
LMArena Creative Writing10891092
LMArena Multi-Turn10131117
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—451

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-3.5-turbo?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-3.5-turbo share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-3.5-turbo has 44.

Related comparisons

Go deeper