Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Gemma 2 2b IT
Falcon-180B and Gemma 2 2b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 33.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 36.5 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 33.1 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1113 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1135 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1157 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1118 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1130 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1118 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
Falcon-180B and Gemma 2 2b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 33.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.