Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 30.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1084 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 35.4% |
| MBPP+ | — | 45% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1071 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1107 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1052 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1060 |
| LMArena French | — | 1064 |
| LMArena German | — | 1054 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 971 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 988 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1049 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1057 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1056 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1094 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1059 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1040 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.