Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Gemini Advanced 0514
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini Advanced 0514 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 48.5 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Gemini Advanced 0514 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1255 |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1248 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1272 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1215 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1274 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1307 |
| LMArena German | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1232 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1242 |
Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1253 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1253 |
Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1269 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini Advanced 0514?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini Advanced 0514 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17.