Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 41.6.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 33.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1251 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1251 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.