Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 50.4.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1346 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1322 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1305 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1307 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1298 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.