Model comparison

ERNIE 5.1 vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.8

Rank #83 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Muse Spark in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 41.9.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.1 and Muse Spark specifications
ERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
ProviderBaiduMeta
Noometry Index43.850.6
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1927

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Coding14881481
SciCode—51.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, Muse Spark: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Search1227—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts14811474
NYT Connections (extended)23.4%—
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Math14811455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Expert14921457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English14541464
LMArena Chinese15081509
LMArena French14881497
LMArena German14701497
LMArena Korean14271459
LMArena Russian14591466
LMArena Spanish14731472
LMArena Japanese1422—

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following14601442

Long Context Too close to call

ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query14621451

Writing & Preference Too close to call

ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Muse Spark
LMArena Text14681474
LMArena Creative Writing14411459
LMArena Multi-Turn14711477

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.1 or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Muse Spark share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper