Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.1
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 20.9 to 10.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 6.5% for Mistral Medium 3.1.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
Math Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.