Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
ERNIE 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 21.9.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 43.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
ERNIE 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.