Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
GPT-5.6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.4 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.6 Sol in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.6 Sol leads 74.7 to 20.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 93.8% for GPT-5.6 Sol.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 64.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 64 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.6 Sol leads
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), GPT-5.6 Sol: 61.1 (#7)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1493 |
| DeepSWE | — | 72.7% |
| FrontierCode | — | 47.5% |
| CursorBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1619 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 32.2% |
| SciCode | — | 57.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 89.4% |
| MirrorCode | — | 20% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 2,177 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 50.2 (#7)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | 1257 |
| APEX-Agents | — | 51.4% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 27.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 46.9% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 36.2% |
| BALROG | — | 60% |
| GBAEval | — | 52.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 30.7% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,619 |
Reasoning GPT-5.6 Sol leads
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), GPT-5.6 Sol: 74.7 (#6)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 93.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1481 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 92.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 71.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 97.5% |
| CritPt | — | 32.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 64% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 37.1% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 44.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 58% |
| DTBench | — | 96% |
| LMCA | — | 59.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 93.1% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.14 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 161.99 |
Math GPT-5.6 Sol leads
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), GPT-5.6 Sol: 85.5 (#7)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1472 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 89.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 82.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 83% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | — | 0% |
Knowledge GPT-5.6 Sol leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), GPT-5.6 Sol: 64.3 (#16)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1517 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 69.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, GPT-5.6 Sol: 48.9 (#8)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.6% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 56.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1483 |
Multilingual Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), GPT-5.6 Sol: 55.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1450 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1523 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | 1475 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1476 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1475 |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | 1434 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1466 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1449 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), GPT-5.6 Sol: 77.8 (#16)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1480 |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), GPT-5.6 Sol: 45.3 (#42)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1479 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.6 Sol leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), GPT-5.6 Sol: 73.5 (#12)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1456 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1450 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1972 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1250 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than GPT-5.6 Sol?
GPT-5.6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.4 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or GPT-5.6 Sol better for coding?
GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.1 versus 43.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and GPT-5.6 Sol share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.6 Sol has 64.