Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs GLM-5V-Turbo
ERNIE 5.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 29.7 to 21.9.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 43.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1466 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1401 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1443 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1441 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1452 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1444 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1423 |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1438 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1432 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
ERNIE 5.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.