Model comparison

ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemma 3 27B

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.8

Rank #83 Confirmed

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3 27B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 44.0 to 22.5.
  • Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 3 27B specifications
ERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
ProviderBaiduGoogle
Noometry Index43.830.8
Released—2025-03-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.08
Output $ / M tokens—$0.16
Results tracked1943

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Coding14881322
Aider Polyglot—4.9%
SciCode—21.2%
LiveBench Coding—39.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—29.5%
LMArena Search1227—

Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Hard Prompts14811340
Kagi LLM Benchmark—40.4%
NYT Connections (extended)23.4%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—43.8%
DTBench—52.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—51.5%
LMCA—12.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.04
LiveBench—50%

Math ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Math14811312
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—22.5%
LiveBench Math—55.4%
MATH Level 5—74%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Expert14921304
GPQA Diamond—47.7%
Confabulations—40.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Vision—1164
GeoBench—52%

Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Non-English14541334
LMArena Chinese15081346
LMArena French14881368
LMArena German14701362
LMArena Japanese14221287
LMArena Korean14271308
LMArena Russian14591349
LMArena Spanish14731349

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Instruction Following14601321
LiveBench Instruction Following—74.9%

Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Longer Query14621333
Fiction.LiveBench—33.3%

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text14681358
LMArena Creative Writing14411346
LMArena Multi-Turn14711345
Short-Story Creative Writing—79.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1266
LiveBench Language—34.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemma 3 27B?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 3 27B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 3 27B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper