Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Wizardlm 13b
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 30.7.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1035 |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1049 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Wizardlm 13b?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.