Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Sonar
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
PerplexitySummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 52.6.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Perplexity |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 38.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 35.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
Reasoning Sonar leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 37.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.9% |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Sonar: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Sonar: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Sonar: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 76.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Sonar: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Sonar?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Sonar better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Sonar share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.