Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3 8B
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 43.0 to 34.0.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 33.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3 8B?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen3 8B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3 8B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.