Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen2.5-Max
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 25.6 to 17.0.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 40.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5-Max leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1360 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.53 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1369 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen2.5-Max: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1377 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1358 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen2.5-Max?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen2.5-Max share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.