Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Llama 3.2 1B
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MetaSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 21.4.
- Llama 3.2 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 19.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 60K |
| Max output | — | 54K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.027 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Llama 3.2 1B: 20.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1071 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 8.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 11.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 14.5 (#142)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Llama 3.2 1B: 15.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1044 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 101.95 |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Llama 3.2 1B: 9.7 (#308)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1086 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1007 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Llama 3.2 1B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Llama 3.2 1B: 23.9 (#287)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 958 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 941 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Llama 3.2 1B: 52.6 (#285)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1031 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#269)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1050 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.4 (#305)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1030 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Llama 3.2 1B?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 20.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Llama 3.2 1B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.