Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Grok 3

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Grok 3 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 55.8.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Grok 3 specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
ProviderBaiduxAI
Noometry Index41.839.9
Released—2025-04-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2040

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Coding14551432
Aider Polyglot—53.3%
WeirdML—37.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Hard Prompts14451434
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.33

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Math14371391
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—55.6%
Omni-MATH—46.4%
MATH Level 5—88.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Expert14281421
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Grok 3: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Non-English14361410
LMArena Chinese15121448
LMArena French14671460
LMArena German14601431
LMArena Japanese13821387
LMArena Korean14061373
LMArena Russian14461416
LMArena Spanish14731417

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Instruction Following14131409
IFEval—88.4%

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Longer Query14221439
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 3
LMArena Text14451426
LMArena Creative Writing14261414
LMArena Multi-Turn14341425
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Grok 3?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Grok 3 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Grok 3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper