Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Granite 4.2 3b

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 47.9.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Granite 4.2 3b specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
ProviderBaiduIBM
Noometry Index41.239.0
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2011

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Coding14551363

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Hard Prompts14461308
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—

Math Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Math1437—

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Expert14271313

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Vision1248—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Non-English14361268
LMArena Chinese15121268
LMArena Russian14461249
LMArena French1466—
LMArena German1462—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Instruction Following14131271

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Longer Query14221293

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Granite 4.2 3b
LMArena Text14451295
LMArena Creative Writing14261215
LMArena Multi-Turn14331293

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Granite 4.2 3b?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Granite 4.2 3b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper