Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6.1 Sol in 9 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 81.9 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 95.5% for GPT-6.1 Sol.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderBaiduOpenAI
Noometry Index41.865.6
Released—2026-09-29
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked2034

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Coding14551487
DeepSWE—75.2%
FrontierCode—50.2%
LMArena WebDev—1755
SciCode—55.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
APEX-Agents—60%
GDP.pdf—32%

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%95.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451466
ARC-AGI-2—94.2%
ARC-AGI-1—98.5%
CritPt—31.7%
Chess Puzzles—61%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
EBR-Bench—54.3%
Mystery Game Puzzles—80%
Epoch Capabilities Index—166.09

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Math14371464
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—93.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—100%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—99%

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Expert14281502
GPQA Diamond—95.4%
SimpleQA Verified—73.9%

Multimodal GPT-6.1 Sol leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision12491288
Furniture Assembly—80%

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Non-English14361438
LMArena Chinese15121477
LMArena Russian14461455
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following14131468

Long Context GPT-6.1 Sol leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Longer Query14221465

Writing & Preference Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text14451447
LMArena Creative Writing14261432
LMArena Multi-Turn14341449

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-6.1 Sol share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper