Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GPT-5 Nano

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.2

Rank #129 Confirmed

GPT-5 Nano OpenAI

33.4

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and GPT-5 Nano in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 39.4.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
ProviderBaiduOpenAI
Noometry Index41.233.4
Released—2025-08-07
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked2048

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), GPT-5 Nano: 33.3 (#248)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Coding14551351
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—34.8%
WeirdML—38.1%
ALE-Bench—718.67

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GPT-5 Nano: 25.6 (#99)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
Terminal-Bench—21.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—51.5%

Reasoning Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), GPT-5 Nano: 16.4 (#291)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Hard Prompts14461329
ARC-AGI-2—2.6%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.2%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
ARC-AGI-1—20.7%
Chess Puzzles—27%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—62.7%
LMCA—7.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.39
ForecastBench—59.1

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), GPT-5 Nano: 29.1 (#221)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Math14371318
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—20%
FrontierMath Tier 4—2.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—81.1%
ProofBench—12%
Omni-MATH—54.6%
MATH Level 5—95.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—8.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), GPT-5 Nano: 35.8 (#166)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Expert14271321
GPQA Diamond—69.4%
SimpleQA Verified—11.7%
MMLU-Pro—77.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
GPQA (HELM)—67.9%

Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), GPT-5 Nano: 30.7 (#102)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Vision12481159
VPCT—37.2%

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), GPT-5 Nano: 45.5 (#167)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Non-English14361313
LMArena Chinese15121355
LMArena German14621329
LMArena Korean14061269
LMArena Russian14461296
LMArena Spanish14731360
LMArena French1466—
LMArena Japanese1383—

Instruction Following Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), GPT-5 Nano: 75.2 (#72)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Instruction Following14131306
IFEval—93.2%

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#275)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Longer Query14221313
Fiction.LiveBench—44.4%

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), GPT-5 Nano: 39.4 (#244)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5 Nano
LMArena Text14451320
LMArena Creative Writing14261250
LMArena Multi-Turn14331311
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—705
WildBench—80.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GPT-5 Nano?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GPT-5 Nano better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-5 Nano share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Nano has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper