Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GPT-5-Codex
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5-Codex leads 30.9 to 17.0.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-09-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), GPT-5-Codex: 42.4 (#103)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 54.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GPT-5-Codex: 31.0 (#72)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 44.3% |
Reasoning GPT-5-Codex leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), GPT-5-Codex: 30.9 (#83)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
Math Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), GPT-5-Codex: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GPT-5-Codex?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GPT-5-Codex better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 42.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-5-Codex share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5-Codex has 3.