Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

59.2

Rank #17 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.6 Terra in 9 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.6 Terra leads 60.7 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 78.4% for GPT-5.6 Terra.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
ProviderBaiduOpenAI
Noometry Index41.859.2
Released—2026-07-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$12
Results tracked2052

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.6 Terra leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), GPT-5.6 Terra: 57.7 (#19)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Coding14551484
DeepSWE—69.6%
FrontierCode—41.3%
CursorBench—41.3%
LMArena WebDev—1522
SciCode—55%
WeirdML—78.3%
ALE-Bench—1,951

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, GPT-5.6 Terra: 40.1 (#25)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
APEX-Agents—58.2%
BALROG—53.2%
GDP.pdf—24.7%
Vending-Bench 2—7,343

Reasoning GPT-5.6 Terra leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), GPT-5.6 Terra: 60.7 (#21)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%78.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451468
ARC-AGI-2—83.9%
SimpleBench—48.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—51.3%
ARC-AGI-1—96.5%
CritPt—30%
Chess Puzzles—54%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—35%
DTBench—93.3%
LMCA—55%
Surface Evolver Bench—83.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—159.62

Math GPT-5.6 Terra leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), GPT-5.6 Terra: 81.6 (#12)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Math14371466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—86%
FrontierMath Tier 4—70.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.7%
ProofBench—74%

Knowledge GPT-5.6 Terra leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), GPT-5.6 Terra: 61.2 (#30)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Expert14281492
GPQA Diamond—93.3%
SimpleQA Verified—43.2%

Multimodal GPT-5.6 Terra leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), GPT-5.6 Terra: 47.3 (#11)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Vision12491271
Blueprint-Bench 2—30.8%
Furniture Assembly—54.2%
LMArena Document—1472

Multilingual Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), GPT-5.6 Terra: 54.4 (#44)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Non-English14361439
LMArena Chinese15121513
LMArena French14671471
LMArena German14601460
LMArena Japanese13821457
LMArena Korean14061425
LMArena Russian14461450
LMArena Spanish14731448

Instruction Following GPT-5.6 Terra leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), GPT-5.6 Terra: 76.4 (#40)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Instruction Following14131454

Long Context Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), GPT-5.6 Terra: 44.4 (#68)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Longer Query14221451

Writing & Preference GPT-5.6 Terra leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), GPT-5.6 Terra: 70.2 (#23)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text14451447
LMArena Creative Writing14261410
LMArena Multi-Turn14341449
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1855
EQ-Bench 4—1234

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GPT-5.6 Terra better for coding?

GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 57.7 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-5.6 Terra share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.6 Terra has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper