Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemma 3 4B

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.8 to 11.8.
  • Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemma 3 4B specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
ProviderBaiduGoogle
Noometry Index41.828.1
Released—2025-03-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.04
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked2022

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
LMArena Coding14551230

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—19.6%

Reasoning ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
LMArena Hard Prompts14451253
Kagi LLM Benchmark—25.2%
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
DTBench—50.9%
LMCA—2.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.02

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
LMArena Math14371239
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.5%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
LMArena Expert14281223
GPQA Diamond—23.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Gemma 3 4B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
LMArena Non-English14361273
LMArena German14601281
LMArena Russian14461294
LMArena Chinese1512—
LMArena French1467—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
LMArena Instruction Following14131239

Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
LMArena Longer Query14221273

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Gemma 3 4B
LMArena Text14451291
LMArena Creative Writing14261271
LMArena Multi-Turn14341255
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1068

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemma 3 4B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemma 3 4B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper