Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemma 2 2b IT
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 33.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1112 |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1113 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1135 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1096 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Gemma 2 2b IT: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1157 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1140 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1118 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1130 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1118 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.